516-464-2320
Marco Law, PLLC
A Construction Law and Commercial Litigation Firm.
CONTRACTORS SHOULD ALWAYS STRICTLY COMPLY WITH BID REQUIREMENTS
In May 2024, a trial court in New York upheld the rejection of a low bid on a New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) project due to the...
MERELY ATTACHING A CHANGE ORDER LOG TO A FINAL VERIFIED STATEMENT MAY BE INSUFFICIENT TO PRESERVE THOSE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY
In March 2024, a trial court in New York upheld a Contract Dispute Resolution Board’s (CDRB) decision to dismiss a contractor’s claim for...
A CONTRACT CAN BE REPUDIATED BY A SIMPLE EMAIL
In March 2024, a trial court in New York determined that a project manager’s email to a subcontractor was sufficient to result in a...
IT IS ILLEGAL TO PERFORM ELECTRICAL WORK UNDER ANOTHER CONTRACTOR’S LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
In April 2024, an Appellate court in New York dismissed a contractor’s claim against a property owner for unpaid electrical work for...
ERRORS OF FACT OR LAW MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO VACATE AN ARBITRATOR’S AWARD
In March 2024, a trial court in New York confirmed an arbitrator’s award, requiring that a property owner pay its contractor the sum of...
COURTS ROUTINELY UPHOLD NOTICE OF CLAIM AND NO ESTOPPEL PROVISIONS IN PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS
In January 2024, a trial court in New York County dismissed a contractor’s claim for extra concrete work against the New York City...
THE SIX (6) MONTH LIMITATIONS PROVISION IN THE CITY CONTRACT IS NOT TOLLED BY DISCUSSIONS OR REVIEW OF A DELAY CLAIM
In November 2023, a trial court in New York County dismissed a contractor’s two-million-dollar delay claim against the New York City...
THE CITY OF NEW YORK HAS NO OBLIGATION TO RESPOND TO AN ARTICLE 11 DELAY CLAIM
In March 2024, the First Department, appellate division of New York, rejected a contractor’s claim that the City of New York, acting...
FAILURE TO UPDATE YOUR SERVICE ADDRESS COULD HAVE DRASTIC CONSEQUENCES
In March 2023, a trial court in New York permitted a project owner to vacate a default judgment against it even though it had failed...
COURT FINDS REDUCED WORK HOURS TO BE A CONTEMPLATED DELAY
In March 2023, an appellate court in New York held that an owner on a public works project was not liable to its contractor for a...
CONTRACTORS MUST BE AWARE OF STATUTORY NOTICE OF CLAIM PROVISIONS
In March 2023, an appellate court in New York dismissed a contractor’s complaint against a town for failing to timely file a verified...
YOUR TERMINATION CLAUSE MAY NOT MEAN WHAT YOU THINK
In November 2022, a trial court in New York ruled that although a subcontractor submitted no invoices for its work prior to termination,...
USING FUNDS IN NEW YORK TO PAY OFF LIABILITIES ON OTHER PROJECTS IS ILLEGAL
In December 2022, a trial court in New York held a contractor and its principal liable to an owner for using funds earmarked for...
A CONTRACT DOES NOT HAVE TO BE SIGNED TO BE BINDING
In December 2022, a trial court in New York ruled that although neither party to an owner’s representative agreement signed it, they were...
FAILING TO COMPLY WITH A SURETY BOND’S NOTICE PROVISIONS COULD BE FATAL TO YOUR BOND CLAIM
In July 2022, a trial court in New York dismissed a contractor’s claim against its subcontractor’s performance bond due to its failure to...
FAILING TO EMPLOY WBEs OR MBEs IDENTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR IN SECURING AWARD IS NOT FRAUDULENT
In October 2022, an Appellate Court in New York ruled that a general contractor’s failure to employ the WBEs and MBEs it identified in...
SECURITY GUARDS ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO PREVAILING WAGES
In October 2022, a trial court in New York ruled that security guards employed on projects owned by the School Construction Authority...
MARCO LAW, PLLC WINS TRIAL - PROVES CARDINAL CHANGE RESULTING IN DAMAGES FOR SUBCONTRACTOR CLIENT
In August 2022, Judge Joel M. Cohen of the Commercial Division in New York County Supreme Court ruled, after a two (2) week trial, that a...
CROSS-DEFAULT PROVISIONS IN CONTRACTS COULD HAVE DRASTIC CONSEQUENCES ON YOUR PROJECTS
In May 2022, a trial court in New York ruled that a subcontractor who breached a subcontract was in breach of all its subcontracts with...